Forest & Bird » Threats & Impacts

1080 and kea

(78 posts)
  • Started 10 months ago
  1. Tawaki
    User Profile

    Wayne Costello
    DOC Area Manager Fran Josef 29 September 2011

    "Kea
    As detailed in my last email - we unfortunately lost 7 kea to 1080 poisoning as a result of this operation. We were monitoring 37 kea in the operational area, so 81% of monitored kea survived. Some erroneous figures have been put out there to enhance various spurious claims - but the information I have provided here is accurate.

    We have continued to monitor kea after the operation using Sky Ranger and there have been no further losses and all the birds appear to be doing well. We have 9 nests currently monitored within the 1080 operation area and 5 monitored in the non-treatment (control) area. Because we have reduced stoats, possums and rats to low levels, kea in the operation area should have an improved and successful breeding season - again I’ll keep you posted on the results. It takes 4 months for a kea nest to successful fledge chicks - so the results of the monitoring will be known by February next year.

    Already in the non-treatment area where 1080 has not been used - one of the nests that we are monitoring has been predated - killing both young chicks. Our research has shown that 60+% of kea nests in this area fail - predominantly due to predation by stoats or possums."

    Wayne reported today (4.30 pm 29 September) with a further update on the kea nests. On 28 September a second of the kea nests in the 1080 untreated control area was destroyed probably by stoats. All 3 kea eggs in the nest were taken. So mortality in the 5 kea nests being monitored in the area that received no pest control with 1080 is now 40%. In the areas that recieved pest control with 1080 all 9 nests are still viable and successful and there has been no predation of the nests by pests.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  2. Update from Ōkārito 1080 operation

    DOC has just issued the following media release

    30 September 2011

    1080 operation nails kiwi killers at Ōkārito

    DOC says the recent 1080 operation at Ōkārito has decimated rat and stoat numbers in the treatment area, lowering the risk to kiwi and other forest birds of predation during the breeding season.

    Post-operation monitoring of the numbers of rats and stoats in the treatment area of Ōkārito Forest has shown that their numbers have plummeted since they were last assessed in August this year. Rodent and stoat numbers in the untreated area remained high.

    Rodent and stoat numbers have been assessed every three months since 2001 using a method called small mammal indexing. The indexing result is a percentage, which gives an idea of how many stoats and rats are around.

    This year, due to the increased availability of food from the fruiting rimu and kahikatea, rat numbers in the treatment area began to climb quickly from 4% in November 2010 to 29% in August this year and were mirrored by a rise in stoat numbers to from 13% in November 2010 to 48% in August. As one stoat can kill dozens of birds in a short space of time, this was a grave threat to the bird species in the area. After the 1080 operation, rat numbers dropped to 1% and stoats were down to 0%.

    Biodiversity Programme Manager Jim Livingstone cautioned that there would still be a few stoats present but their numbers are now far lower than before the operation.

    “We know from similar operations in other places to expect up to 40% chick loss but this is far better than the normal 95% losses that happen without control,” Mr Livingstone said.

    Rats were found to be present on the edge of Ōkārito Forest, but only in the untreated ‘buffer zones’ outside the treatment area. Rat numbers in the nearby untreated ‘control’ area were very high at 95%, and stoat numbers were also comparatively high at 23%.

    DOC’s Franz Josef Waiau Area Manager, Wayne Costello said, “This operation has been on hold for three years, as we waited for the right level of rodent and stoat numbers in the forest. The results of our monitoring after the operation have shown that we timed the operation just right. By taking out the main predators of kiwi and other bird species, we are ensuring that our native species have the best possible chance of raising chicks successfully in the wild. 1080 is undoubtedly the best tool available for us to achieve this goal”.

    DOC is also closely monitoring the kea population in the treatment area. Out of a monitored group of 37 birds, 7 died of 1080 poisoning immediately after the operation. Two weeks of intensive monitoring after the operation have confirmed that all other monitored birds in the treatment area are alive and appear to be doing well. However, a monitored kea nest in the untreated ‘control’ area was plundered by a stoat last week, and the newly hatched chicks were killed.

    “It’s disappointing to lose any of these wonderful birds,” said Mr Costello, “but the surviving kea within the area of the 1080 operation should now be able to successfully raise their chicks without facing the threat of predation by stoats or possums.”

    More than 60% of kea nests fail in the Ōkārito area, predominantly due to predation by stoats and possums when no pest control is undertaken. A four year research programme is underway to assess the overall effect of 1080 operations on kea populations, and to find ways to minimise the risk to kea. So far the study has found that without predator control, only 36% of kea nests are successful in fledging a chick.

    The aerial 1080 possum control operation involved three years of planning and was jointly run by the Animal Health Board and DOC. The operation covered 30,000ha which included the South Ökärito kiwi sanctuary, North Ökärito forest, and a large forested buffer zone around Franz Josef Township itself. The operation is intended to provide New Zealand’s rarest kiwi – rowi – protection from rats, stoats and possums as well as providing protection to local farms from the threat of bovine tuberculosis.

    ENDS

    Photo caption:
    DOC ranger Anna Colombus with the first wild-hatched rowi chick in Okarito to have a radio transmitter attached to it so that the effectiveness of the 1080 operation can be monitored.

    Contact: Wayne Costello - Area Manager, Franz Josef Waiau Area, Department of Conservation

    DDI: +64 3 752 0794 | M: +64 22 009 2963

    Further information:

    Small mammal indexing is a method of comparing the relative abundance of stoats and rodents in an area over an extended period of time.

    Small plastic tunnels are set along numerous lines within the study area, and pieces of card with inkpads set into them are placed in the tunnels. The tunnel is then baited with peanut butter (for rodents) or rabbit meat (for stoats). The animal runs over the inkpad to get the bait leaving its footprints behind on the card. The cards are then collected and assessed.

    The percentage of cards with tracks on them is then compared to the results from previous indexing work. This gives a good indication of whether the numbers of pests in an area is increasing or decreasing, and at what rate.

    For additional information about the benefits 1080 has had for kaka, bellbird and other bird populations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09y8uw5tV6o

    Attachments

    1. Anna_Colombus_DOC_with_first_wild_hatc.jpg (57.2 KB, 0 downloads) 7 months old
    Posted 7 months ago #
  3. ethos
    User Profile

    "In the areas that recieved pest control with 1080 all 9 nests are still viable and successful and there has been no predation of the nests by pests. "

    Does this include the nests of the seven dead kea or are we using skewed data?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  4. In the wake of commentary over the loss of seven out of 37 monitored kea in Okarito, Department of Conservation West Coast conservator Mike Slater tells the Greymouth Evening Star that it is time for people to take all the information into account.

    (via www.facebook.com/1080facts#!/photo.php?fbid=268587713175797&set=a.129052383795998.14834.106600472707856&type=1&theater)

    Attachments

    1. Mike_Slater_opinion_piece_-_Protecting.jpg (149.1 KB, 3 downloads) 7 months old
    Posted 7 months ago #
  5. ethos
    User Profile

    You are not going to answer the question then Animal Health Board?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  6. Ethos, you'll need to ask DOC that question - they're doing the monitoring work. However, I'm not sure I follow your logic about the data being skewed. Surely the point of the survey is to see what percentage, if any, of nine monitored nests fail. It is irrelevant to the study whether there are only nine nests in the forest, or there are 900. It is the survival rate of the nine that is of interest.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  7. Ethos, here are the contact details for the DOC Area Manager for the Franz Josef Waiau Area, Wayne Costello:

    DDI: +64 3 752 0794 | M: +64 22 009 2963

    I suggest, if you haven't already done so, that you read the recent post by Tawaki on the 'Okarito Kiwi' thread - it is the latest update from Okarito.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  8. ethos
    User Profile

    Ive read it thanks.
    The Animal Health Board are partners in this operation are you not?
    Is the Animal Health Board not privy to their own statistics?
    Could you please clarify if the nesting survival for kea quoted in this study so far actually includes the nests of the dead birds.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  9. ethos
    User Profile

    I disagree also that the deaths of adult kea are irrelevant although all the publicity from yourself and DoC would like to suggest so Animal Health Board.

    It is misleading to the public to suggest all kea nests survive an aerial 1080 drop simply because the birds you have killed with young which die from starvation nest in a neighbouring unmonitored area.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  10. Ethos, DOC are doing the monitoring work, not the AHB. You really need to direct any questions to them.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  11. ethos
    User Profile

    Animal health Board, what do you think of this paper:
    http://www.keaconservation.co.nz/pdfs/conservation_ecology.pdf

    "Population modeling showed that a change in adult survival has roughly four times
    the impact on population growth as a proportional change in any other parameter" ?

    And this paper:
    http://www.keaconservation.co.nz/pdfs/kea_pva_1993.pdf
    showed that increasing mortality in kea fledglings by 20% (what was the mortality rate of kea to the 1080 drop in Okarito again?) caused the population to crash to extinction, remember above that adult mortality was considered four times worse than fledgling mortality in terms of population effects.

    And now the figures will ignore the soon extinct kea population from which the dead birds came, and trumpet the temporary nesting success of a small number of others in a tiny monitored area.

    Who exactly do you think you are fooling?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  12. auckland anne
    User Profile

    Why would anyone be fooling anyone? What's the point?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  13. ethos
    User Profile

    I'll be interested in seeing what AHB says too, anne.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  14. auckland anne
    User Profile

    Yeah, so will I. My question was to both parties. Everyone in fact. We're here to get conservation done, not to fool anyone. 23 years I've been on the F&B branch committee, and the amount of ego-related stuff I've seen compared to the amount of active conservation done has simply amazed me! Lots and lots of talk and not too much action by more than a minority.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  15. Ethos, the first study you link to was conducted in the Southern beech forests of Nelson Lakes National Park. By contrast, Okaritio is predominantly podocarp.
    All dead kea at Okarito were found in an area of heavily-logged mixed podocarp forest. As the study paper clearly states, "we can not be certain that similar results would be found elsewhere in the Southern Alps".

    Research shows that up to 60% of kea nests fail in un-treated West Coast podocarp forests. The figure is far lower in un-treated Nelson beech forests - around 30% according to this paper.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  16. Ethos, in answer to your second point, the paper actually says "Setting mortality between fledging and 1 year as 40% an adult mortality at 5%, populations increased with mortality of 5 to 10% in the intervening sub-adult years, remained fairly stable at 20% mortality these years and declined to extinction with mortalities of 30% or higher".

    Seven out of 37 minitored birds died at Okarito. This equates to 19% of the population. So, based on the paper you cite, this should have no net effect on the population. You also need to remember that, prior to this pest control operation, up to 60% of nests would have failed. The risk of predation this breeding season is now practically zero.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  17. ethos
    User Profile

    Sorry I dont appear to have explained properly:
    The other part of my post pointed out that adult mortality was worse by a factor of 4 than fledgling mortality. - you appear to have not read that bit?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  18. ethos
    User Profile

    AHB you left out this part of this paper: http://www.keaconservation.co.nz/pdfs/conservation_ecology.pdf
    "Due to the relatively low kea nest predation rate and the apparently regular escape of
    adult females, we conclude that there is no immediate need for predator control to
    enhance kea nesting success"

    This paper http://www.keaconservation.co.nz/pdfs/kea_pva_1993.pdf
    says
    "Catastrophes 91 in model) with 50% probability (i.e. once every two years on
    average), no effects on reproduction, and reducing survival by 20% (SUR = 0.80 on
    table) to 40% (SUR = 0.6), led kea populations to decline to (or almost to) extinction"

    Of course in Okarito we have an AVERAGE extra mortality over and above baseline mortality, of 19% and its in adults, much more damaging to the population than fledgelings.

    Interesting you bring up forest type, if we want be more specific to locality lets notice the local effect on kea.
    All 7 dead kea were from North Okarito, what was the monitored kea population for North Okarito? 9?
    What then was the mortality rate for kea from North Okarito to the poison drop?
    78% mortality?

    As shown in posts above, adult mortality (being 4 x times more significant than any other factor) of 20% can be enough to trigger a local extinction event. DoC and the AHB achieved a 78% kill of kea in North Okarito.

    Posted 7 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.