Forest & Bird » Threats & Impacts

  1. Tawaki
    User Profile

    The Government needs to start treating New Zealanders as intelligent people. We will not be deluded by ridiculous Government claims that there are "billions" of dollars of minerals in the Schedule 4 National Park and Conservation Reserves available as soon as their legal protection is stripped away.

    Everyone in business knows that while you might start with dreams of riches and business success, the reality is quite different. There is an enormous challenge and great risk in building every successful business. Nowhere is this more true than in mining, an industry awash with false promises and shattered dreams.

    Unfortunately if you look through the line up of Government Ministers involved in this mining threat to our most precious conservation land, none of them have any experience in building and running real businesses. These have to provide a product or service to meet consumer demand, work with the community, employ people and face all the day to day challenges that this entails. It is far easier for these well paid Ministers to gloss over the technical details and just claim that billions of minerals are there for the taking.

    The Prime Minister was a currency trader who, in his time at Merrill Lynch, made his fortune gambling on the manipulation of exchange rates particularly of the $Kiwi..to me one of the most despicable activities of modern society. Financial gambling of this type on currencies and property is the tragedy that caused the current world economic recession.

    The Minister of Conservation is a lawyer. The Minister of Energy and of Economic Development has been receiving a Government salary for much of his working life.

    If you talk to most experienced people in the mining industry, they scoff at the extravagant Government claims that these conservation areas contain billions of easily accessible mineral wealth.

    For Example: The 2009 report by the Government Agency Crown Minerals, located within the Ministry for Economic Development, is the basis for this Government grab for our most precious conservation land. It claims that there are billions of dollars of titanium in the Barrytowm Flats ilmenite sands located 40km north of Greymouth on the West Coast. This "billion dollar resource" has excited people for at least the last 50 years since titanium started being used as a steel hardener.

    Fletcher Titanium in 1985 initiated plans to mine the sands. I was on their Environment and Community Advisory Board 1985-89 representing Forest and Bird. They gifted a large reserve of their freehold land that didn't contain ilmenite sands to Forest and Bird. This contained Westland Black Petrels and was named the Forest and Bird Dick Jackson Memorial Reserve. Fletcher Titanium also contributed financially to black petrel conservation. Meanwhile they set up a pilot plant at Barrytown and started to trial the extraction of ilmenite. The trial proved both an economic and technical failure. The whole Barrytown operation was then sold to North Broken Hill and then later NBH was acquired by Rio Tinto, the world's second biggest mining company.

    In 2005, Rio Tinto advised those of us still involved in advocating for the protection of the Black Petrels and the Barrytown wetlands, that the Eastern Bloc countries and Russia and elsewhere have absolutely enormous reserves of titanium sands. These reserves dwarf anything that New Zealand has. In Rio Tinto's view, supported by all the world's best mining engineers and business people, the Barrytown sands can never be economically mined.

    Rio Tinto on 12 March 2010 took part in a ceremony with the Minister of Conservation where the Barrytown Sands are to be legally protected as a reserve. With Rio Tinto's support, the Punakaiki Conservation Trust made up of community volunteers are now replanting the entire area to become a natural buffer around the Westland Black petrel breeding colonies.

    So who are we to believe? Government officials and Ministers who claim billions of dollars of minerals located at places like the Barrytown sands are just waiting to be plucked from the mining tree of bountiful riches? Or do we believe the world's second largest mining company who have just walked away from what these officials and Ministers claim are billions of dollars of titanium!

    Come on John Key. Get real. Stand up for the real businesses in New Zealand that pay your salary such as my nature tourism business and all those hard working tourist operators on Great Barrier Island, Rakiura, the Coromandel and at the Paparoa National Park. Our businesses are very reliant on NZ's clean green image and environmental performance and right now this is being tainted by your Government's mining antics.

    Forget your idiotic billion dollar mining dreamland. It isn't there and all you are succeeding in doing is damaging New Zealand's green reputation to the rest of the world.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. Tawaki
    User Profile

    The billions of mining dollars that the Government dreams are waiting to be plucked from special conservation lands is a mirage.

    The serious economic damage the Government's mining antics are causing to New Zealand's international image is not a mirage. It presents an immediate danger to our tourist industry and our carefully developed international image.

    UK tourists, one of the most important markets for New Zealand nature tourism, are very sensitive to any advice that New Zealand may be a blighted paradise. These tourists can holiday anywhere in the world, but many choose New Zealand because they are confident from what they read and view, that NZ is clean, green, lightly populated, stunningly beautiful and that New Zealanders are friendly and care for nature.

    Image is absolutely vital in tourism.

    The latest story in the very influential UK Guardian newspaper will dash some of those UK tourists NZ expectations. It slams our Government's efforts to seek the removal of Schedule 4 protection from some NZ national park and reserve areas.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/3499693/NZs-green-image-takes-bashing

    Only 6 weeks ago, our Wilderness Lodge business was reviewed in The Guardian as one of only 77 businesses worldwide that they recommended for "Eco tourism Escapes" We received a great deal of UK tourism interest following the publication of that story and that actually translated into real money and real jobs. Every person that came to stay with us as a consequence of that article went on to spend further money that was distributed right through NZ's nature tourism industry as they whalewatched, kayaked in Abel Tasman, rented cars, ate meals, stayed in NZ accommodation places and passed through Auckland Airport.

    There will be a measurable impact from the Guardian story slamming our government's mining plans. It might be hard to quantify but if even one traveller decides to go elsewhere after reading the article that is a loss to New Zealand. Our once proud green image is under serious threat.

    Should the Minister of Tourism resign and appoint a Minister who cares about our global image?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. Kaipara
    User Profile

    Yes, he should resign ! As should the MInister of Conservation.

    Even worse than the article in the Guardian, is the article in the latest Ecomomist entitled "It's not easy seeming Green" !

    At this link; http://www.economist.com/world/international/displayStory.cfm?story_id=15763381

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. auckland anne
    User Profile

    You'll have to excuse me but I'm sure that you'll understand when I say that I thought the Minister of Conservation HAD resigned!! I had always thought that the Minister of Conservation defended the Dept of Conservation and it's estate.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. brent
    User Profile

    yes there is a lot of mirage and not much reality in mining being a solution to an improved balance of trade or NZ economy. beyond the point well made that it is hard to make money on spec mining; the point for NZ is that the vast majority of any wealth generated from mining in sched 4 or anywhere accrues to overseas interests - so even if/when/where wealth is generated it goes offshore, while the pollution etc. stays here.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. kauri
    User Profile

    You hav to ask yourselves why is this govt so craven to the internationally funded mining industry ?

    Whats really driving this commitment to mining our valued conservation lands ?

    Do some of the govt have other reasons for pushing wot most nzers think is a crazy proposal ?

    Whats really going on ? Why are they so intent on pissing off half of the electorate ?

    OR is this mining proposal a smokescreen for something even worse going on that the govt dosnt want us to pay attention to !!!!!!!?????? wot else is happening at the moment we should be looking at ?

    Though perhaps thats too machiavellian even for them ? Are they that smart/stupid ?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  7. Kaipara
    User Profile

    After reading the Economist article, you have to wonder how long it will take for the Government to rebrand its tourism marketing and drop the 100% Pure logo.

    Perhaps they have already engaged an ad agency to create a new brand, so they can quietly "update" the current one !?

    Posted 1 year ago #
  8. auckland anne
    User Profile

    Interesting comments in certain media about how the figures about the $ value of mining are being doctored http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/3509183/Mining-figures-made-up

    Remembering of course that this plan was all drawn up on the back of an envelope to start with....

    Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.