Forest & Bird » High Country

  1. If some of you missed the One News item on cubicle style farming (featuring our wonderful Sue Maturin)- here 'tis -

    http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/cow-cubicles-could-hurt-nz-s-image-3234899/video

    Sixteen dairy operations have made applications for resource consent to house 18,000 cows in the South island's iconic high country. It is currently before Ecan (Environment Canterbury)

    As you'll know cows produce 15 times more waste than humans, so our high country and its river systems will be absorbing the equivalent waste of 270,000 people.

    Just thinking about all of those unhappy cows, unhappy freshwater & alpine creatures and unhappy tourists makes the whole idea seem utterly ridiculous.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. auckland anne
    User Profile

    And another news item about dirty dairying from this sort of set-up
    http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/6558931/plans-for-factory-dairy-farming-stir-protests/

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. Helen
    User Profile

    It isn't just factory farming that creates problems in the Mackenzie Basin - the overall expansion of dairy farming into this naturally dry high country region is creating a wider problem. Enormous irrigators are already turning the naturally red/brown tussockland bright green. There are currently 110 applications to Environment Canterbury to irrigate the Mackenzie Basin - this would irrigate more than 18,000ha and take more than 90 million cubic metres of water each year. This has the effect of:
    1. Turning naturally dry landscapes and vegetation into green dairy pasture.
    2. Emptying braided rivers of much of their water flows (affecting endangered species that live there)
    3. Producing run-off of effluent and nitrogen into high country lakes and rivers.
    4. Producing massive amounts of greenhouse gases.
    5. Destroying the magnificent high country landscapes much loved by NZers and which attract tourists from aroudn the world.
    And none of this required a cubicle ...

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. Helen
    User Profile

    Stuff also has an interesting column on the issue here:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/blogs/frontline/3137587/Battery-cow-farming-has-no-place-in-NZ/
    Interesting to see that a lot of people who do not identify as "green" oppose dairy factory farming.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. True, true, our drylands should remains just that - dry. Emptying our rivers and turning the McKenzie country into the Canterbury plains is just unthinkable in my mind.

    Here's an article on what we'd be losing if we did just that -

    http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/what-we-do/publications/forest-bird-magazine/articles-archive/precious-mackenzie

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. Tawaki
    User Profile

    I entirely agree with the opposition to cubicle cow farming not the least of which is the opposition expressed by Fonterra. A key 'Point of Difference" for NZ dairy products is that they are not from animals raised indoors in a totally artificial environment but instead are from animals grazing grass outdoors. We need to be selling our products with a premium for quality not just on their cheap price which usually means we cut corners on protecting the environment.

    You'd have thought that the advocates of cow cubicles might have learn't from the controversy about battery hens, pigs raised in totally inadequate spaces (sow crates) and the mad cow epidemic in Europe/North America where animals that normally feed on grass were fed animal offal including brain tissue.

    New Zealand's brand image is absolutely essential in marketing our products worldwide and for our tourism industy. When we come under threat we have to urgently fix the problem unless we want to be tainted worldwide.

    Over the last 10 years, animal welfare groups have targetted the practice of mulesing of merino sheep. This treatment of lambs at tailing (6 weeks old) gives them a bare bottom so that maggots cannot hatch out and eat the sheep in the dung that gathers around a woolly lambs bottom. The NZ merino industry has quickly adapted to that animal welfare groups campaign. Mulesing in NZ has largely stopped. The alternatives involve lots more chemicals and a lot more crutching and mustering and hence a lot more cost and possibly considerable more animal suffering.....but we are a small country and we cannot stand against the tide of market opinion....and we can still sell our merino wool.

    Australia on the other hand has been very stubborn. It has not changed its practices and its merino wool has been boycotted in a lot of markets.

    The dairy industry is usually much smarter than most other NZ farming industries so it should be at the forefront of opposing this factory farming.

    The Mackenzie country dairy development is not necessarily going to supply milk products to Fonterra so Fonterra may not have any control over the developments.

    NZ Dairy Ltd, the nearest factory, have a huge new processing plant down the Waitaki Valley in South Canterbury. I think this company is now almost totally Russian owned after they bought out the NZ shareholders.

    Do they care about NZ's image or do they just want to produce milk products at the cheapest possible price??

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. Helen
    User Profile

    Federated Farmers president Don Nicholson just doesn't seem to get it. Lately he has been quoted in the media defending cubicle cow farming, farmers' contribution to the most polluted river in the Western world, and mining of conservation land, as well as asserting that farmers are being asked to do too much to combat climate change. I'm sure that the more forward-thinking among our farming communities are not well represented by this sort of comment on their behalf.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. auckland anne
    User Profile

    But cubicle cows would be much easier to pack and ship in refrigerated shipments. I wonder if they produce milk already in square boxes, or butter and cheese already in blocks?. Or if the green patches from the irrigation will be square not circular?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. Tawaki
    User Profile

    The Mackenzie country dairy development is not necessarily going to supply milk products to Fonterra so Fonterra may not have any control over the developments.

    NZ Dairy Ltd, the nearest factory, have a huge new processing plant down the Waitaki Valley in South Canterbury. I think this company is now almost totally Russian owned after they bought out the NZ shareholders.

    Do they care about NZ's image which Fonterra clearly does or do NZ Dairies just want to produce milk products at the cheapest possible price??

    I've now been advised that the Russian factory is located at Studholme and prior to it being opened in the last year, their milk was being trucked to Hokitika, presumably because the Fonterra factory at Clandeboyne (South Canterbury) would not process a rival's milk or maybe was operating to capacity.

    In summary
    *The drylands of the Mackenzie are being transformed to dairy lands by adding water. Natural drylands and their plants and animals are disappearing.

    * These are not family dairy farms but large agribusiness conglomerates. I wonder who their banker is?

    * Water is being taken from the Waitaki system to do this.

    * The dairy farming requires huge use of nitrogen fertiliser (made from petrochemicals) to grow the crops to feed the cows.

    * Runoff from the farms goes into the Waitaki system.

    * A cow cubicle system undermines the image of "free range" outdoor cows eating natural grass that NZ has portrayed to world markets.

    * The milk is then trucked from these new farms probably to the Russian owned factory.

    *In that factory, huge quantities of coal are used to evaporate the milk to make milk powder. These dairy factories are one of the largest users of coal in NZ and collectively rank up there with the Huntley coal fired power station.

    * Phenomenal amounts of the greenhouse gases CO2, methane and nitrous oxide are produced by this whole process at the very time we should be drastically reducing our production of these gases.

    * No wonder this farming industry and the dairy factories sought and received an exemption from the ETS for their greenhouse gas production. The taxpayers instead are going to cover the costs of their emissions.

    CAN SOMEONE TELL ME THE UPSIDE TO NEW ZEALAND (IF ANY) OF THIS COW CUBICLE PROCESS?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. On top of the carbon emissions, the battery farming, the destruction of this unique biodiversity, the untold damage it will do to our 'clean, green image', the end product of all this is milk powder.

    Milk powder that is aggressively marketed to Asian (mainly Chinese, I assume) mothers who believe that this is better than their own breast milk. I have a New Zealand friend who had to beg his Chinese wife to breastfeed her child for two weeks. Using milk powder is seen as more prestigious. The whole cycle is just rotten from beginning to end.

    Here's the article about the NZ Dairy company and about their ambitions to move into milk-based baby products -

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rural-property/news/article.cfm?c_id=81&objectid=10583017&pnum=1

    And on the decline of breastfeeding in China -
    http://www.unicef.org/china/media_11002.html

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. Tawaki
    User Profile

    Agriculture Minister David Carter has tonight expressed his concern and now wants to "investigate" the proposed cubicle cow farming in the Mackenzie Basin.

    Good.

    Not so good is that Minister Carter and his Government have opposed every effort to protect the high country dryland ecosystems most threatened by this factory dairy farming.

    In 2007-8, the Nature Heritage Fund (NHF) worked with the Lory family of Omarama to permanently protect their 2,000 hectare valley floor tussock property Tarnbrae. The $4 million purchase price tag for Tarnbrae seemed a lot at the time, but in hindsight it is perhaps the most valuable purchase the NHF has made in its 20 year history.

    Today the red tussock, wetlands, small streams feeding the Wairepo Kettle lakes and moraines of Tarnbrae are almost entirely surrounded by intensively developed introduced pasture scheduled for factory dairy farming. Tarnbrae is surrounded by the farmland where the cubicle cow farming is proposed.

    Tarnbrae would have gone exactly the same way if the Crown had not intervened and bought this extraordinary high country ecosystem as a reserve. Prior to the Crown purchase, dairy farmers were lining up to buy Tarnbrae. The Lory family had safeguarded this land for many years and accepted the Crown bid ahead of others because they wanted these special wetlands protected as a reserve. Tarnbrae is now called the "Ohau Moraines Wetland Complex" and is a key part of the new Ahuriri Conservation Park

    Minister Carter has made it very clear now as a Minister and also previously when he was in Opposition that he opposes the Crown purchase of natural lands for conservation. Presumably if the DOC purchase option is not acceptable to him , he sees advocacy under the Resource Management Act as a more appropriate way to save precious places like Tarnbrae or perhaps hopes that the factory farmers will set aside places like Tarnbrae under voluntary "conservation covenants"...........Yeah Right!!.

    Yet even with the concept of RMA advocacy, Carter's cabinet colleagues, Rodney Hide and Nick Smith are makng it incredibly difficult to protect, under the RMA, ecosystems threatened by irrigation and dairy development.

    There are strenuous Government efforts to gut Environment Canterbury (ECan). ECan is currently under a Treasury led review. It has also recently been the subject of a farmer/rural led coup within ECan councillors to make the Council view irrigation more favourably.

    DOC is also under great pressure to restrict its RMA advocacy generally. This will limit DOC's ability to advocate for the protection of dryland tussocklands on the Mackenzie Basin valley floor.

    These are dark times for the conservation of rivers and of valley floor tussock grasslands.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. Tawaki
    User Profile

    Development of the dairy farms around Tarnbrae has had one beneficial effect. Hundreds of hectares of "out of control" Lodgepole Pine (P Contorta)has been cleared by the farmers to develop the dairy land. Seeds from these weed trees can spread up to 50km. They therfore threatened the vast area of dryland ranges east of here as far as the Kirkliston Mountains and Hakataramea Valley.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. Helen
    User Profile

    Golly Tawaki, that was a short post from you. Next you'll be posting things in txt like a tngr or sumfing like dat! awsum!

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.