Forest & Bird » Threats & Impacts

Please help challenge a new anti-1080 petition

(3 posts)
  • Started 10 months ago
  1. The anti-1080 lobby has recently been promoting a new online petition through care2's 'petitionsite'. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ban-1080-poison-in-new-zealand

    For what its worth, I've written to both the petition organiser and the Care2 admins (I've done this before and had no response) to ask that the petition be removed on the basis that it includes a large number of fraudulent claims that may deceive people into mistakenly signing something they wouldn't want to.

    Examples of the fraudulent claims include:

    1) "1080 been banned all over the world except for NZ". In fact, it is used in Australia, Japan, Israel and the USA.

    2) "1080 kills kiwi" There is absolutely no evidence that it has ever killed kiwi - in fact, kiwi are thriving in forests where 1080 has been used.

    3) 1080 poisons drinking water" In fact, from September 1990 to February 2011, 2537 water samples have been tested after aerial 1080 operations – none of those taken from drinking water supply contained any trace of 1080.

    4) "The Dept of Conservation is laying this poison all over the forest floor". In fact, DOC currently treat just 2% of the conservation estate with 1080. An independent Parliamentary Commission recently judged this to be far too little, and cautioned that without wider use of 1080, many of NZ's unique animals and plants risk extinction.

    5) "92% of New Zealanders are opposed to 1080". According to what? No referendum has been conducted, and there are plenty of other polls that suggest differently - this certainly shouldn't be purported as fact

    6) "1080 was used by the Nazis to kill millions of Jews" WTF! This one's so outlandish it almost doesn't warrent a comment!

    Luckily, this kind of bandwaggon-jumping "armchair activism" is pretty harmless - here's an interesting article on the subject

    http://www.allfacebook.com/facebook-activism-pitfalls-2010-05

    Most of the people signing the petition are from overseas and, from what they write, clearly have little or no understanding of the calamity NZ is facing as a result of introduced pests. The very fact that the anti-1080 lobby have to recruit non-New Zealanders to support their losing battle is actually quite telling.

    Saying that, I don't think it would do any harm if a few more people wrote to the Care2 admin team to complain about petitions like this - they may not be harmful in themselves, but the cumulative effect of misinformation on the web is ultimately a lot more damaging for the NZ conservation effeort because it makes it harder for the public to know what to believe or form a dispassionate, informed opinion about something.

    You need to sign up to Care2. It's free and doesn't take long. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/

    Don't forget that www.1080facts.co.nz, a site set up by F&B and Federated Farmers as a joint initiative to give the public easy access to the facts about the safe and necessary use of 1080 in New Zealand, is a good place to refer people to.

    Cheers.

    Posted 10 months ago #
  2. The Animal Health Board has started its own petition, primarily to provide factual information about the safe and necessary use of 1080 poison in New Zealand.

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/220/--if-gte-mso-9xml-wworddocument-wviewnormalwview-wzoom0wzoom-wtrackmoves-wtrackformatting/

    It asks that people thinking about signing an anti-1080 petition first read a few facts about how and why the poison is used in NZ. It's not so much about numbers as awareness. Saying that, we would certainly encourage all of you to sign it and leaving a message for those people who are still making up their minds.

    Thanks

    Posted 10 months ago #
  3. Published on Scoop today:

    The Animal Health Board (AHB) has launched an online appeal encouraging the public to ‘find out the facts first’ in a bid to counteract the spread of misinformation about the use 1080 poison in New Zealand.

    “Public petition sites like Care2 are a valuable forum for raising awareness about a range of issues,” said AHB Communications Manager John Deal.

    “Unfortunately, they are also easily co-opted by people who set out to deliberately mislead the public by posting a range of unsubstantiated claims.”

    A classic example of the tactics opponents of 1080 will resort to is a recent petition posted on Care2. It makes a string of highly emotive claims including:

    • “Nazis used 1080 to kill millions of Jews during the war”
    • “New Zealand is the only country in the world that uses 1080”
    • “1080 is killing our native kiwi”.

    Even the briefest of online searches will easily disprove these so-called ‘facts’. Unfortunately it’s not something all petition signatories will take the time to do.

    “People genuinely interested in finding out more about 1080 are struggling to find factual, science-based information in amongst all the hyperbole, rhetoric and deliberate misinformation out there,” said Mr Deal.

    The Animal Health Board has created its own Care2 petition “Stop the ignorance about 1080 poison and save New Zealand’s native wildlife” - http://www.thepetitionsite.com/220/--if-gte-mso-9xml-wworddocument-wviewnormalwview-wzoom0wzoom-wtrackmoves-wtrackformatting/

    “The idea is to provide objective information to anyone thinking about signing a ‘stop 1080’ petition to take a few minutes to research how and why the poison is used first,” said Mr Deal.

    Evidence that 1080 is both safe and necessary, backed up by peer-reviewed scientific research can be found online. A good starting point is the 1080: The Facts website www.1080facts.co.nz - a joint public education initiative set up by Forest & Bird and Federated Farmers to ensure the public have easy access to balanced, factual information about 1080. The Animal Health Board website http://www.ahb.org.nz/Default.aspx?tabid=180 and Department of Conservation website http://www.doc.govt.nz/conservation/threats-and-impacts/animal-pests/methods-of-control/1080-pest-control/1080-questions-and-answers/ also have a large amount of scientifically-backed information.

    Why the Animal Health Board uses 1080:

    • The Animal Health Board (AHB) is an incorporated society, legally responsible for managing and implementing the National Pest Management Strategy (NPMS) for bovine tuberculosis (TB) in New Zealand. Its powers derive from the Biosecurity Act 1993.

    • The mission of the Animal Health Board is to eradicate bovine TB from New Zealand.

    • In New Zealand, the brush-tailed possum (a non-native species introduced in the nineteenth century from Australia for its fur and released into the wild) is recognised as the main cause of TB infection in cattle and deer herds.

    • Possums are highly susceptible to bovine TB. Because the disease is spread by close contact between animals, possums can maintain the disease in the wild due to their high population density and the amount of social interaction between individuals.

    • Control of the possum population is the key to the AHB’s management of TB infection. Keeping possum numbers low has been shown to reduce the incidence of TB infection in cattle and deer herds.

    • In 1994 at the peak of the TB crisis in New Zealand there were more than 1700 infected herds.

    • As at June 2011, there were 77 infected cattle herds and four infected deer herds.

    • A variety of techniques are used in possum control programmes, including the aerial application of sodium fluoroacetate (1080) baits, ground application of poisons, and trapping. The choice of technique depends on a wide range of factors, including cost-effectiveness, terrain, and environmental considerations.

    • Where terrain is difficult to access, aerial application of 1080 has been found to be extremely effective in quickly reducing possum population numbers.

    • Ground control methods, using either traps or poisons, are the most commonly-used techniques.

    • On average, in any one year, 80 per cent of control operations are ground-based and only around 20 per cent rely on aerial 1080.

    • The AHB’s use of 1080 is subject to strict regulation and control by a range of agencies including the Ministry of Health.

    • The use of sophisticated GPS technology helps to ensure that aerial bait drops avoid specified water catchments and other excluded areas.

    • The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment released an independent, comprehensive review of the use of 1080 in New Zealand in June 2011. The report found that 1080 was the best tool in New Zealand to control predatory pests such as possums and subsequently protect the dairy, beef and deer industries. It was also found to have widespread conservation benefits for native birds and forests.

    ENDS

    Posted 9 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.